Friday, 30 October 2015

Doubts about Islam - Guidance for Challenging Times ~ Dr. Yasir Qadhi



For every convert brother or sister we welcome to the faith realize that there are ten who are thinking of leaving the faith!
For every Muslim that comes to the Friday prayers there are three or four Muslims that simply do not care about Islam at all.
In today's challenging times many young Muslims have doubts & uncertainties about their religion and a phenomenon of skepticism and agnosticism seems to be poisoning the Muslim Ummah from inside!
In this talk at the special MSA (Muslim Students Association) session Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi begins the conversation on why is the Muslim world lagging behind and how we can motivate ourselves by thinking deeper!
This talk is dedicated to all our young brothers and sisters who are struggling.
~ [YQ Admin]

Wednesday, 14 October 2015

Speaking Truth to Power and Standing Up Against Oppression ~ Dr. Yasir Q...





While Muslim lands all over the globe helplessly burn under tyrannical rule, with news reaching us every day of innocent women, children and men killed in attacks; and as American foreign policy continues to create extremist groups by invading Muslim lands to quench their everlasting thirst of oil; and while the media and the far-right continue to smear our faith and our Prophet...the time to be politically correct is long gone!
Muslims with inferiority complexes keep apologizing for actions committed by extremist groups in the name of Islam; yet they never criticize the political issues that cause such extremism in the first place. And while Muslims must and should criticize people who misinterpret Islam, we must move beyond mere 'criticism' and actually work for the betterment of the Ummah.
In this powerful and emotional talk, delivered in front of the largest annual gathering of Muslims in North America, Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi shares his thoughts on the current state of Islamophobia in America, and the dismal situation in Muslim lands and how we should work together to speak out against oppression and injustice.
Join Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi as he speaks truth to power and stands up for the rights of the oppressed.
A talk not to be missed!

Saturday, 10 October 2015

It was mutton, not beef!

NEW DELHI: A forensic test has proven that the meat that the India lynch mob found in a Muslim
family’s fridge last week, which they claimed was the proof they needed to lynch him, was mutton, not beef. 
Mohammad Akhlaq's family, in the Dadri district in Uttar Pradesh, had insisted all along that there was no beef in the house, but Akhlaq and his 22-year-old son Danish were dragged out of their home in Bisada village, and brutally attacked by a mob of 200.
Akhlaq did not survive the attack and his son has now been moved from the ICU of a local hospital.
Hindus consider the cow a sacred animal and several states in India have banned its slaughter.
On the night of Sept. 28, police collected a sample of the meat from Akhlaq's house and sent it to a vet for preliminary testing. These tests suggested it was mutton, but the police sent the sample to another lab in Mathura for a conclusive test. That report also confirmed it was mutton, a top government official said. Seven people allegedly involved in the incident have already been arrested.

http://www.arabnews.com/world/news/818251

Friday, 9 October 2015

Out of six largest meat suppliers in India four are Hindus - Expatriates across Gulf to Boycott Indian Meat

Out of six largest meat suppliers in India four are Hindus

By Muslim Mirror Special Correspondent ,
When we see this matter  in an Indian perspective we would be surprised to know that out of six largest meat exporters of India four are Hindus.In spite of these  facts Muslims are  harassed and targeted and as beef eaters. In several cases they are beaten severely by Hindutva brigades and put behind bars by the  police. Many times communal riots took place only due to this blame game. These communal elements become more active during Eid ul Azha festival only to communalize the atmosphere.
But the same Hindutva brigades forget the Hindu animal sacrifice festivals which get media attention  world over  in which thousands of animals are killed ruthlessly.
There’s a ritual of sacrificing cow which is still performed in many temples of Himachal Pradesh, Surprisingly  the high court had to intervene to stop those animal killings in the premises of Mandir specially at the Pashupatinath Temple
Recently in Nepal around a  quarter million animals were killed during Gadhimai  Hindu rituals festival .
Ironically many Hindu Businessmen  are the largest beef suppliers of India.Following are the four   largest  beef exporters who are Hindus.
1) Al-Kabeer Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Its owner name: Mr. Shatish &Mr. Atul Sabharwal
Add: 92, Jolly makers, Chembur Mumbai 400021
2) Arabian Exports Pvt.Ltd.
Owner’s name: Mr.Sunil Kapoor
Add: Russian Mansions, Overseas, Mumbai 400001
3) M.K.R Frozen Food Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Owner’s name Mr. Madan Abott.
Add : MG road, Janpath, New Delhi 110001
4) P.M.L Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Owner’s name: Mr. A.S Bindra
Add : S.C.O 62-63 Sector -34-A, Chandigarh 1600

Monday, 5 October 2015

In India, meat and murder threaten Modi’s inclusive agenda

BISARA, India: The murder by a mob of a man rumored to have slaughtered a cow has thrown a spotlight on the hard-line, polarizing agenda of some followers of Indian Prime Minster Narendra Modi, undermining his promise of development for all.
On a tour of Silicon Valley last month where he was feted by US tech gurus and Indian emigres, Modi won a pledge from Microsoft to provide low-cost Internet for 500,000 villages to back his vision of a globally networked “Digital India.”
One such village is Bisara, 50 km from the capital New Delhi, where a crowd of assailants broke into Mohammed Akhlaq’s home last Monday night, beat him to death and dragged his body out into the street.
The local member of parliament, Mahesh Sharma, is also Modi’s culture minister and has hit the headlines of late with statements that show a different side to their ruling party. In one recent speech, Sharma vowed to cleanse public life “polluted” by Western influences.
Visiting Bisara this week to pay his respects to Akhlaq’s family, Sharma said the killing could have been an “accident.”
“How can the leader call my husband’s murder an accident?” Akhlaq’s widow Ikraman, who suffered facial injuries, told Reuters at the family home. 
“I don’t think the minister knows the difference between an accident and murder.”
Critics say Sharma’s comment implicitly condoned Akhlaq’s lynching and pandered to fringe Hindu militants who have recently become active in the district.
Eating beef is a taboo for many Hindus, who make up 80 percent of India’s population of 1.25 billion people, but not for the country’s 175 million Muslims.

BLOOD ON THE WALLS

Communal clashes had never erupted in Bisara, home to 400 landowning Hindu and 35 Muslim families, even when religious riots have broken out in the region. 
In 2013, 65 people died in sectarian strife around the northern town of Muzaffarnagar.
But an announcement by a priest over his temple loudspeakers that Akhlaq had butchered a cow and that his wife was cooking beef for dinner brought a sudden end to the village’s tradition of tolerance, according to family members and villagers who heard the call.
Within minutes a mob stormed into Akhlaq’s house, vandalized the kitchen in search of beef and beat the 56-year-old blacksmith to death with bricks and stones. His body was dragged out in front of his family.
Akhlaq’s youngest son, who suffered severe head injuries, is fighting for his life in a hospital intensive care unit after undergoing two brain operations.
His widow says he was killed for a crime he did not commit.
“Even now I can’t believe that my Hindu neighbors killed my husband. My neighbors were like my extended family,” said Ikraman, who will spend a month in mourning in a room near the bloodstained murder scene.

PREMEDITATED ATTACK?

Local Muslims say Akhlaq’s killing was a pre-meditated attack aimed at polarizing the village on religious lines by militant Hindu groups loyal to Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which won power in the May 2014 general election.
Sharma and Modi are both members of an umbrella group, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), that is the BJP’s ideological parent. The movement propagates an ideology of Hindutva, or Hindu-ness, which asserts that India is a Hindu nation.
Police have arrested seven Hindu youths over the murder and one paramilitary soldier accused of planning the attack. 
Investigators are also searching for activists who spread rumors and online posts stating that Akhlaq had stored 6 kg (13 lbs) of beef in his refrigerator.
The region holds village council elections next week and Bisara has, in the wake of the killing, become a magnet for campaigning politicians. One BJP lawmaker accused of instigating the Muzaffarnagar riots came to Bisara on Sunday and warned of a “befitting reply” if the suspects were prosecuted, according to news reports.
Many Indian states, including the country’s largest Uttar Pradesh, where Bisara is situated, have banned cow slaughter for more than two decades.
Modi’s party has, in states where it rules, clamped down further on eating beef — even though India is the second largest exporter and fifth biggest consumer in the world. In recent months, government leaders have advocated a national ban on cow slaughter.

BEEF VIGILANTES

Critics say tougher anti-beef laws discriminate against Muslims, Christians and lower-caste Hindus who rely on the cheap meat for protein.
The crackdown has, meanwhile, provided cover for the rise of vigilante groups.
Such groups attack cattle trucks, track religious conversions in villages and towns, and warn Hindu girls against falling in love with Muslim boys. Modi has expressed no disapproval toward them.
“Those who spread this poison enjoy his (Modi’s) patronage,” political analyst Pratap Bhanu Mehta wrote in the Indian Express. 
“This government has set a tone that is threatening, mean-spirited and inimical to freedom.”
Sharma’s office said the minister was demanding an independent federal investigation into Akhlaq’s murder. Calls on Sunday to three officials in Modi’s office went unanswered.
At least 16 men from Bisara joined a new militant Hindu outfit called the Samadhan Sena (Solution Army) in August. The group is not formally tied to the RSS but two members told Reuters they would enforce its agenda in every village.
“Akhlaq should not have butchered a cow,” said Ajay Singh, a member of the Samadhan Sena in Bisara. 
“He should not have forgotten that India belongs to Hindus first.”

http://www.arabnews.com/world/news/815906

Sunday, 4 October 2015

90 Verses in the Bible say Jesus is not God

The word ‘son’ cannot be accepted literally because in the Bible, God apparently addresses many of his chosen servants as ‘son’ and ‘sons.’ The Hebrews believed God is One, and had neither wife nor children in any literal sense.  Therefore, it is obvious the expression ‘son of God’ merely meant ‘Servant of God’; one who, because of faithful service, was close and dear to God as a son is to his father.  
Christians who came from a Greek or Roman background, later misused this term.  In their heritage, ‘son of God’ signified an incarnation of a god or someone born of a physical union between male and female gods.  This can be seen in Acts 14: 11-13, where we read that when Paul and Barnabas preached in a city of Turkey, pagans claimed they were gods incarnate.  They called Barnabas the Roman god Zeus, and Paul the Roman god Hermes.
Furthermore, the New Testament Greek word translated as ‘son’ are ‘pias’ and ‘paida’ which mean ‘servant,’ or ‘son in the sense of servant.’ These are translated to ‘son’ in reference to Jesus and ‘servant’ in reference to all others in some translations of the Bible.  So, consistent with other verses, Jesus was merely saying that he is God’s servant.
Additional problems with Trinity
To a christian, God had to take human form to understand temptation and human suffering, but the concept is not based on any clear words of Jesus.  In contrast, God does not need to be tempted and suffer in order to be able to understand and forgive man’s sins, for He is the all knowing Creator of man.  This is expressed in the verse:
‘And the Lord said: ‘I have surely seen the affliction of My people that are in Egypt, and I have heard their cry because of their taskmasters; for I know their pains.’ (Exodus 3:7)
God forgave sin before Jesus’ appearance, and He continues to forgive without any assistance.  When a believer sins, he may come before God in sincere repentance to receive forgiveness.  Indeed, the offer to humble oneself before God and be saved is made to all humankind.
‘And there is no God else beside Me; a just God and a Savior; there is none beside Me.  Look to Me, and be saved, all the ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is none else.’ (Isaiah 45:21-22, Jonah 3:5-10)
Biblically, people can receive forgiveness of sins through sincere repentance sought directly from God.  This is true at all times and in all places.  There has never been a need for the so-called inter cessionary role Jesus plays in attaining atonement.  The facts speak for themselves.  There is no truth to the Christian belief that Jesus died for our sins and salvation is only through Jesus. What about the salvation of people before Jesus? Jesus’ death brings neither atonement from sin, nor is it in any way a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.
Christians claim that in the birth of Jesus, there occurred the miracle of the incarnation of God in the form of a human being.  To say that God became truly a human being invites a number of questions.  Let us ask the following about the man-God Jesus.  What happened to his foreskin after his circumcision (Luke 2:21)?  
Did it ascend to heaven, or did it decompose as with any human piece of flesh?  During his lifetime what happened to his hair, nails, and blood shed from wounds?  Did the cells of his body die as in ordinary human beings?  If his body did not function in a truly human way, he could not be truly human as well as truly God.  Yet, if his body functioned exactly in a human way, this would nullify any claim to divinity.  It would be impossible for any part of God, even if incarnate, to decompose in any way and still be considered God.  The everlasting, one God, in whole or in part, does not die, disintegrate, or decompose: ‘For I the Lord do not change.’ (Malachi 3:6)
Did Jesus’ flesh dwell in safety after his death?  
Unless Jesus’ body never underwent ‘decay’ during his lifetime he could not be God, but if it did not undergo ‘decay’ then he was not truly human.
Bible says that God is not man‘God is not a man’ (Numbers 23:19)
‘For I am God, and not man’ (Hosea 11:9)
Jesus is called a man many times in the Bible‘a man who has told you the truth’ (John 8:40)
‘Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know.’ (Acts 2:22)
‘He will judge the world in righteousness through a man whom He has appointed’ (Acts 17:31)
‘the man Christ Jesus’ (Tim. 2:5)
The Bible says that God is not a son of man
‘God is not a man nor a son of man’ (Numbers 23:19)
  • The Bible often calls Jesus ‘a son of man’ or ‘the son of man.’
    ‘so will the son of man be’ (Matthew 12:40)
  • ‘For the son of man is going to come’ (Matthew 16:27)
  • ‘until they see the son of man coming in His kingdom.’ (Matthew 28)
  • ‘But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority’ (Mark 2:10)
  • ‘because he is the son of man’ (John 5:27)
  • In the Hebrew scriptures, the ‘son of man’ is also used many times speaking of people (Job 25:6; Psalm 80:17; 144:3; Ezekiel 2:1; 2:3; 2:6-8; 3:1-3).
    Since God would not contradict Himself by first saying He is not the son of a man, then becoming a human being who was called ‘the son of man’, he would not have done so.  Remember God is not the author of confusion. Also, human beings, including Jesus, are called ‘son of man’ specifically to distinguish them from God, who is not a ‘son of man’ according to the Bible.
    The Bible says that Jesus denied he is God
    Jesus spoke to a man who had called him ‘good,’ asking him, ‘Why do you call me good?  No one is good except God alone.’ (Luke 18:19)
    And he said to him, ‘Why are you asking me about what is good?  There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.’ (Matthew 19:17)
    Jesus did not teach people that he was God 
    If Jesus had been telling people that he was God, he would have complimented the man.  Instead, Jesus rebuked him, denying he was good, that is, Jesus denied he was God.
    The Bible says that God is greater than Jesus
    ‘My Father is greater than I’ (John 14:28)
    ‘My father is greater than all.’ (John 10:29)
    Jesus can not be God if God is greater than him.  The Christian belief that the Father and son are equal is in direct contrast to the clear words from Jesus.
    Jesus never instructed his disciples to worship him
    ‘When you pray, say Our Father which art in heaven.’ (Luke 11:2)
    ‘In that day, you shall ask me nothing.  Whatsoever you ask of the Father in my name.’ (John 16:23)
    ‘The hour cometh and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth; for the Father seeketh such to worship him.’ (John 4:23)
    If Jesus was God, he would have sought worship for himself 
    Since he didn’t, instead he sought worship for God in the heavens, therefore, he was not God.
    Jesus worshipped the only true God
    ‘that they might know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.’ (John 17:3)
    ‘he continued all night in prayer to God.’ (Luke 6:12)
    ‘Just as the son of man did not come to be served, but to serve’ (Matthew 20:28)
    How did Jesus pray to God?
    ‘he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father’ (Matthew 26:39)
    ‘During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.’ (Hebrews 5:7)
    Who was Jesus praying to when he fell on his face?
    Was Jesus crying in tears to himself pleading to be saved from death? No man, sane or insane, prays to himself!  Surely the answer must be a resounding ‘No.’ Jesus was praying to ‘the only true God.’ Jesus was the servant of the One Who sent him.  Can there be a clearer proof that Jesus was not God?
    The Quran confirms that Jesus called for the worship of the Only True God:
    “It is Allah Who is my Lord and your Lord; then worship Him. This is a Way that is straight.” (Quran 3:51)
    Disciples did not believe Jesus was God
    The Acts of the Apostles in the Bible details the activity of the disciples over a period of thirty years after Jesus was raised to heaven.  Throughout this period, they never referred to Jesus as God.  For instance Peter stood up with the eleven disciples and addressed a crowd saying:
    ‘Men of Israel, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know.’ (Acts 2:22)
    For Peter, Jesus was a servant of God (Confirmed In Matthew 12:18)
    ‘The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus.’ (Acts 3:13)
    ‘God raised up his servant’ (Acts 3:26)
    When faced by opposition from the authorities, Peter said
    ‘We must obey God rather than men!  The God of our fathers raised Jesus’(Acts 5:29-30)
    The disciples prayed to God just as they were commanded by Jesus in Luke 11:2, and considered Jesus to be God’s servant.
    ‘they raised their voices together in prayer to God.  ‘Sovereign Lord,’ they said, ‘you made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and everything in them.’ (Acts 4:24)
    ‘your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed.’ (Acts 4:27)
    ‘of Your holy servant Jesus.’ (Acts 4:30)
    ‘I am indeed a servant of God.’ (Quran 19:30)
    The Bible says that Jesus was God’s servant
    ‘Behold, My servant, whom I have chosen, in whom My soul is well pleased.’(Matt 12:18) Since Jesus is God’s servant, Jesus can not be God.
    The Bible says that Jesus could not do anything by himself
    ‘The son can do nothing by himself; he can only do what he sees his Father doing.’ (John 5:19)
    ‘I can of mine own self do nothing.’ (John 5:30)
    The Bible says that Jesus did not consider himself equal with God
    and that God performed miracles through Jesus & Jesus was limited in what he could do:
    ‘But when the crowds saw this, they were awestruck, and glorified God, who had given such authority to men.’ (Matt. 9:8)
    ‘a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst.’ (Acts 2:22)
    ‘he went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him.’ (Acts 10:38)
    If Christ was God, the Bible would simply say that Jesus did the miracles himself without making reference to God.  The fact that it was God supplying the power for the miracles shows that God is greater than Jesus.
    Also, Jesus was limited in performing miracles 
    One time when Jesus tried to heal a blind man, the man was not healed after the first attempt, and Jesus had to try a second time (Mark 8:22-26). 
    Once a woman was healed of her incurable bleeding.  The woman came up behind him and touched his cloak, and she was immediately healed.  But Jesus had no idea who touched him:
    ‘At once Jesus realized that power had gone out from him.  He turned around in the crowd and asked, ‘Who touched my clothes?’ (Mark 5:30)
    ‘He could not do any miracles there, except lay his hands on a few sick people and heal them.’ (Mark 6:5)
    Quite obviously, someone with such limitations can not be God.  The power of miracles was not within Jesus.
    The Bible says that at times of weakness angels strengthened Jesus
    God ,however, does not need to be strengthened. Human need to be strengthened; God does not because God is All-Powerful.  If Jesus had to be strengthened, he must not be God.
    ‘An angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him - in the garden of Gethsemane’ (Luke 22:43)
    ‘Then the devil left him; and behold, angels came and began to minister to Him’ (Mark. 1:13)
    ‘And he was in the wilderness forty days being tempted by Satan; and he was with the wild beasts, and the angels were ministering to him.’ (Mark 1:13)
    The Bible says that Jesus wanted God’s will to be done
    ‘not my will but Yours be done.’ (Luke 22:42)
    ‘I do not seek my own will, but the will of Him who sent me.’ (John 5:30)
    ‘For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of Him that sent me.’ (John 6:38)
    Are some members of the coequal Trinity subservient, and less than equal, to other members?  Even though they have different wills (‘I do not seek my own will’), do they obey without question the others’ commands (‘the will of Him who sent me’)?  Jesus admits to subordinating his own distinct will, yet according to the Trinitarian doctrine they should all have the same will.  Should one of the triune partners have to forgo his own will in favor of the will of another member of the Trinity?  Should not they all have the exact same will?
    The Bible says Jesus regarded himself and God as two
    ‘I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father.’ (John 8:17-18:)
    ‘Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me.’ (John 14:1)
    If Jesus was God, He would have not have regarded God’s testimony as separate from his own.
    The Bible says that Jesus is subordinate to God
    ‘Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.’ (1 Corinthians 11:3)
    ‘When he has done this, then the son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.’ (1 Corinthians 15:28)
    Bible says that Jesus grew in wisdom & learning
    But God is All Wise & does not need to learn: Jesus grew in wisdom, but God is all wise ‘Great is our Lord and abundant in strength; His understanding is infinite.’ (Psalms 147:5)
    ‘And Jesus increased in wisdom.’ (Luke 2:52)
    God does not need to learn, but Jesus learned: ‘Although he was a son, he learned obedience’ (Heb. 5:8)
    Jesus had limited knowledge, but god’s knowledge is infinite. Since Jesus did not know, he was not all-knowing, and therefore, he cannot be the God whose knowledge is all-encompassing.
    ‘No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the son, but only the Father.’ (Mark 13:32)
    Bible says that Jesus was tempted, but God cannot be tempted
    ’tempted in every way - just as we are’ (Heb. 4:15)
    ‘for God cannot be tempted by evil’ (James 1:13)
    Since God can not be tempted, but Jesus was, therefore, Jesus was not God.
    Bible says that Jesus’ teachings were from God, not from himself
    ‘So Jesus answered them and said, ‘My teaching is not mine, but His who sent me.’ (John 7:16)
    Jesus could not have said this if he were God because the doctrine would have been his.
    Bible says that Jesus died, but God cannot die
    The Bible teaches that Jesus died. God cannot die. Romans 1:23 and other verses say that God is immortal. Immortal means, ‘not subject to death.’ This term applies only to God.
    Bible says that Jesus lived because of God
    ‘I live because of the Father.’ (John 6:57)
    Jesus cannot be God because he depended on God for his own existence.
    Bible says that Jesus’ powers were given to him
    ‘All power is given unto me.’ (Matt 28:18)
    God is all-powerful, no one gives God His powers, otherwise He would not be God because He would be weak.  Therefore, Jesus could not be God.
    Bible says that Jesus was taught & commanded by God
    ‘As my Father hath taught me, I speak these things,’ (John 8:28)
    ‘The Father, who sent me, he gave me a commandment.’ (John 12:49)
    ‘I have kept my Father’s commandments.’ (John 15:10)
    No one can teach God, otherwise God cannot be All-Knowing and would owe His teacher.  Since Jesus was taught and commanded by God, Jesus cannot be God himself.  The teacher and the student, the commander and the commanded are not one.
    Bible says that God made Jesus ‘Lord’!
    ‘God has made this Jesus both Lord and Christ.’ (Acts 2:36)
    ‘Lord’ is used in many ways in the Bible, and others beside God and Jesus are called ‘Lord.’ For example:
    1)    property owners (Matt. 20:8)
    2)    heads of households (Mark 13:35)
    3)    slave owners (Matt. 10:24)
    4)    husbands (1 Pet. 3:6)
    5)    a son called his father Lord (Matt. 21:30)
    6)    the Roman Emperor was called Lord (Acts 25:26)
    7)    Roman authorities were called Lord (Matt. 27:63)
    ‘Lord’ is not the same as ‘God.’ ‘Lord’ (the Greek word is kurios) is a masculine title of respect and nobility used many times in the Bible.  If Jesus was God, then for the Bible to say he was ‘made’ Lord would make no sense.
    Bible says that Jesus was lower than angels
    ‘But we do see him who was made for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Jesus.’ (Hebrews 2:9)
    God, the Creator of angels, can not be lower than His own creation, but Jesus was.  Therefore, Jesus was not God.
    Bible says that Jesus called the Father ‘my God’
    ‘My God, My God, why have You forsaken me?’ (Matt. 27:46)
    ‘I ascend to my Father and your Father, and my God and your God.’ (John 20:17)
    ‘the temple of my God the name of my God the city of my God comes down out of heaven from my God.’ (Rev. 3:12)
    Jesus did not think of himself as God, instead Jesus’ God is the same as ours.
    Bible says that God cannot be seen
    But Jesus was seen by others ‘no man has seen God at any time.’ (John 1:18)
    Bible says twice that Jesus was accused of being God
    But he denied it: According to the Bible, on only two instances the Jews opposed Jesus on the basis that he pretended to be God or equal with God. Had Jesus, may the mercy and blessings of God be upon him, claimed to be God, he is likely to have been opposed on this basis more frequently.
    Because in these two instances, when charged, in the one case, with making himself God, and in the other, with making himself equal with God, he denied the charges.  In reply to the charge of being an equal with God, he says immediately:
    ‘The son can do nothing of himself, but what he sees the Father do’; and directly after ‘I can of mine own self do nothing.’ (John 5:19, 30)
    In answer to the charge of making himself God, he appeals to the Jews in substance thus: Your own Scriptures call Moses a god, and your magistrates gods; I am surely not inferior to them, yet I did not call myself God, but only the ‘son’ of God (John 10:34-36).
    This is unlikely to have been Jesus’ actual response.  Hastings in ‘The Dictionary of the Bible’ says, ‘Whether Jesus used it of himself is doubtful.’ Grolier’s encyclopedia, under the heading ‘Jesus Christ,’ says, ‘it is uncertain whether the Father/Son language (Mark 18:32; Matt. 11:25-27 Par.; John Passim) goes back to Jesus himself.’ A University of Richmond professor, Dr. Robert Alley, after considerable research into newly found ancient documents concludes that:
    ‘The (Biblical) passages where Jesus talks about the Son of God are later additions. what the church said about him.  Such a claim of deity for himself would not have been consistent with his entire lifestyle as we can reconstruct.  For the first three decades after Jesus’ death Christianity continued as a sect within Judaism.  The first three decades of the existence of the church were within the synagogue. That would have been beyond belief if they (the followers) had boldly proclaimed the deity of Jesus.’
    Assuming Jesus did say that he was ‘son’ of God.  What did it mean?  We first need to know the language of his people, the language of the Jews to whom he was speaking.
    The Bible says God had many ‘sons’
    First, most people think there are no other verses that contradict or give equal divine sonship to other persons in the Old or New Testament.  
    For Jesus to be called son of God, does not make him a true son of God, other wise Adam, Jacob, Ephraim and many more should also be considered as been sons of God as such they should be worshiped too according to such method.
    Adam: ‘Adam, which was the son of God.’ (Luke 3:38)
    Jacob is God’s son and firstborn: ‘Israel is my son, even my firstborn.’ (Exodus 4:22)
    Solomon: ‘I will be his father, and he shall be my son.’ (2 Samuel 7:13-14)

    Ephraim: ‘for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn.’ (Jeremiah 31:9)
    is God’s firstborn, common people are called the sons of God: ‘Ye are the children of the Lord your God’ (Deuteronomy 14:1)

Saturday, 3 October 2015

Four-year-old boy beheaded in human sacrifice in southern India

A four year-old-boy has been beheaded in a gruesome "human sacrifice" ritual in a rural village in southern India. 
Indian media reports a 35-year-old man abducted the little boy as he was returning home from nursery in the remote Prakasam district of Andhra Pradesh state.
The man, named as Tirumala Rao, is reported to have beheaded the child in a ritual to honour the Hindu Goddess Kali and he was alleged to be seeking "divine powers", according the Times of India.
Mr Rao was discovered next to the little boy's, named locally as Manu Sagar, body.
Police officers believe he strangled the boy before chopping his head off as they found rope at the scene.
Villagers then attempted to lynch Mr Rao, tying him to a pole, throwing kerosene on him and setting him on fire, reports the Indian Express
Villager elders rescued him from the mob and called the police.
He was taken to hospital with 40 per cent burns.    
Local police chief Ch SriKanth told the Hindu newspaper: "This is a first-of-its-kind incident in Prakasam district.
"Once he recovers, he will be subjected to questioning after an examination of his mental condition by a psychiatrist."
He said Mr Rao was rumoured to have a history of links to people who perform tantric rituals and earlier made an unsuccessful attempt to abduct a young girl.